The Hp Pretecting Predicament

Deanna Earle MGMT 1125 George Erwin September 6, 2012 Case Study 5: The HP Pretexting prosecute 1. What argon the ethical smothers in this moorage? In this caseful their wee a ethical issues that had to do with the corporation and the individuals engages with it. support identity card member were untrusting and wish wellwise use work phones and emails to let out information to the public. George Keyworth was not a ethical person because he leaked confidential information and also let a probe be opened, instead of organism honest. CEO Dunn showed an ethical lieu and was forced to resign by board members, which describes the other board members to be unethical also. 2. Who are the stakeholders impacted by this line? How would you rank their claims? Everyone related to this participation is affected by this situation. Investigators and employees didnt want to observe involves because they didnt want to investigate their induce bosses o r be involve in conflicts of interest. I envisage their claims were reasonable but take upt calculate deed should be taken upon them.

alone to prevent this issue there should be a policy or clause addressing this issue with its consequences so it doesnt progress again. 3. Was the investigation into the recurring countersign leaks ethical? Why or Why not? What action would you recommend that a community in a similar situation take? I dont think this was ethical. I dont think information discussed in a board should be discussed or brought to the media unless they are doing something illegal. Without candor and tru st these board members will also have these ! issues. I think policies and consequences should handle situations like this. Someone should not be able to show dishonesty, omit of respect or unethical decisions and still be a part of that company.If you want to get a full essay, hallow it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay